Showing posts with label eligibility. Show all posts
Showing posts with label eligibility. Show all posts

Monday, December 5, 2011

Adoption in Pakistan


This is an interesting article on adoptions in Pakistan.


Adoption: Demand for abandoned babies far outstrips supply

Published: December 1, 2011
524570 The Edhi Centre says that applications have to be processed carefully as there are fake cases. DESIGN: SHEHREZAD MAHER
KARACHI: 
Every month, at least one or two babies rescued from garbage dumps or the Edhi Centre’s cradles arrive at its head office near Sarrafa Bazaar in Boulton Market. But while they may have been abandoned by their biological parents, plenty of other couples are lining up to give them a home. In fact, demand far outstrips supply.
The Edhi Centre, which has earned a reputation of being the most reliable philanthropic organisation in the country, has thousands of pending adoption applications, some of which have come from abroad. Bilquis Bano Edhi, who is in charge of the adoption process, puts the number of such forms in the range of 6,000 to 7,000.
She told The Express Tribune that since they set up the centre in 1951, about 19,600 babies have been given to foster parents. But though more and more people are abandoning their babies, there are still not enough to meet adoption demands. “Most of them do not even survive the stage where they can be given for adoption as they are premature,” Bilquis Edhi pointed out.
About 80% of these unwanted babies are girls because of the persistent perception in Pakistani society that this sex is a burden. Thus, the adoption form clearly states that if you want a baby boy, you will have to wait longer.
The process for adoption takes place through the Edhi’s head office in Karachi and can take from two to twelve months. “You have to be really careful who you hand over a child to as there are a lot of fakers,” said Edhi. Potential foster parents are first sifted out and then a team from the organisation visits their house.
The criteria for the selection of the parents is extremely stringent and inflexible. “I won’t give babies to a couple in which the husband is too dominating, where I see that the mother is getting no respect or where the parents are too poor to afford the cost of upbringing,” she said.
Over the years, Edhi has become pundit of the adoption process. There are couples who plead for a baby and want to present the child to their families as their own. Some women who feign pregnancy also plead for a newborn baby so that they can tell their husbands and their families that they have given birth to that child. “I never give babies to such people because when the truth is unveiled, it can devastate the entire family, including the child,” she said.
Babies are only given to couples who are well-off and happily married. But even then, some bitter experiences with these types have taught Bano Edhi to be extra cautious. About two years ago, a doctor and her husband came to adopt a baby and were immediately given a baby girl as their profile was stronger than that of the other applicants. But later it was discovered that the doctor had sold the baby. “I have become extremely careful since then,” said Bano Edhi.
There are 13 conditions for adopting a child. The first one is that the decision of the chairman, Bilquis Edhi, cannot be challenged. The details of the biological parents and adoptive parents are kept extremely secret. The law in Pakistan does not allow adoption – only ‘kifala’ is permitted in which monetary and emotional care can be given to the child, but not obligations or rights. An abandoned baby has no legal identity and the state does not register such a child as a citizen. (A petition has been filed recently to challenge this).
Adopting through Edhi is therefore ‘closed adoption’ (confidential or secret adoption), whereby the record of the biological parent is kept confidential and the child is given the name of the adoptive parent. Most of the abandoned babies are found with slips which mention the name and the religion of the baby.

Monday, November 28, 2011

Let sex offenders adopt and work with children, says report


London School of Economics family law expert calls for each case to be judged on merit

Hands of child and parent
Adoption: blanket bans on sex offenders are open to legal challenge, the LSE report argues. Photograph: Lisa Spindler/Getty Images
The government could face legal action if it continues to ban sex offenders from working with children, according to research published today.
A report by a family law expert argues that some sex offenders should be allowed to adopt or foster children, and claims that the current blanket ban is discriminatory.
"Sex offenders shouldn't all be tarred with the same brush," said Helen Reece at the London School of Economics, who wrote the report. "People need to be carefully screened for adoption and fostering, but each case should be taken on its merits.
"There shouldn't be blanket rules. What somebody has done before is not necessarily what he or she will do again. When someone has served a sentence, as far as you can, you should treat them the same as anyone else."
The report points to legal challenges that have overturned other blanket bans on adoption, including a 2008 case in which the House of Lords said rules in Northern Ireland preventing cohabiting couples from adopting children were discriminatory.
"If we believe that blanket bans are an effective and legitimate means to protect children then we should no more allow cohabiting couples to adopt or foster than convicted sex offenders," said Reece.
But claims in the report that cohabiting couples can present more of a risk to children than sex offenders are likely to provoke anger among groups concerned with child protection.
Responding to the report, the government said child and adult safety was its priority. "It is vital that children and vulnerable adults are protected," a Home Office spokesperson said. "We are committed to ensuring that decisions on who is suitable to work with the vulnerable are proportionate and meet the test of common sense."
Sex offenders have been prohibited from working with, and adopting, children since 2006, when measures were put in place to prevent a recurrence of the murder of schoolgirls Jessica Chapman and Holly Wells by school caretaker Ian Huntley in Soham.
The "vetting and barring" scheme introduced by the 2006 law has divided opinion, and was halted by the home secretary, Theresa May, in June after criticism that it was "draconian" and would deter volunteers .
This month a group of nurses who had been automatically placed on the barred list after they committed offences at work successfully challenged the scheme in the high court, claiming their human rights had been violated.
"The vetting and barring scheme contradicts human rights legislation and is therefore challengeable," said Reece. "I agree with this government that it should be brought back to commonsense levels."